ToolStack

Smartsheet vs FullStory

Side-by-side comparison · Updated 2026-03-30

Our VerdictSmartsheet wins overall

By G2 score and review volume, Smartsheet has the edge. 21,000 reviews at 4.4/5 puts it ahead of FullStory (4.5/5). That said, the right pick depends on your methodology and team size.

Choose Smartsheet if…

Choose Smartsheet if your team focuses on project tracking and resource management and fits a scaleup, enterprise profile. Starting at $9/user/mo/user/mo with a free tier. Spreadsheet-familiar interface makes adoption easy for teams transitioning from Excel — minimal training needed for basic use

Choose FullStory if…

Choose FullStory if your team focuses on session replay and user behavior analysis and fits a startup, scaleup profile. Free tier available. Best-in-class autocapture technology — captures every click, scroll, and interaction without manual event tagging, enabling retroactive analysis on historical data

Smartsheet
by Smartsheet
4.4
out of 5 · 21k+ G2 reviews
Visit Smartsheet
FullStory
by FullStory
4.5
out of 5 · 900 G2 reviews
Visit FullStory

Feature Comparison

FeatureSmartsheetFullStory
Category
work_management
session_replay
G2 Score
4.4 / 5.0
4.5 / 5.0Better
G2 Reviews
21000
900
Free Tier
Starting Price
$9/user/mo
Mobile App
AI Features
API Access
SSO / SAML
SOC 2
Learning Curve
moderate
moderate
Platforms
web, mac, windows, ios, android
web

Pros & Cons

Smartsheet

Pros
Spreadsheet-familiar interface makes adoption easy for teams transitioning from Excel — minimal training needed for basic use
Extremely powerful Gantt chart and dependency tracking capabilities, ideal for traditional project management and waterfall methodologies
Robust automation engine with conditional logic, approval workflows, and automated notifications that scale across the organization
Strong portfolio-level dashboards and reporting allow PMOs to aggregate data across dozens or hundreds of projects
Cons
Not designed for agile/Scrum teams — lacks native sprint planning, backlog management, and velocity tracking
Pricing can escalate quickly at scale since every collaborator who edits needs a licensed seat
Sheet-based architecture creates data silos — cross-sheet references and formulas become complex and brittle at scale

FullStory

Pros
Best-in-class autocapture technology — captures every click, scroll, and interaction without manual event tagging, enabling retroactive analysis on historical data
Frustration signals (rage clicks, dead clicks, error clicks) surface UX problems automatically, saving PMs hours of manual session review
Powerful search and segmentation — find specific user sessions by any combination of events, user properties, or frustration signals in seconds
Strong privacy-by-design approach with automatic PII masking, excluded elements, and HIPAA-compliant configurations for regulated industries
Cons
No transparent public pricing — Business and Enterprise plans require contacting sales, making budgeting difficult for smaller teams
Session-based pricing can become very expensive at scale, especially for high-traffic consumer products with millions of monthly sessions
Data retention on lower tiers is limited — teams may lose access to historical sessions unless on Enterprise plans

Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on your needs. Smartsheet scores 4.4/5 on G2, while FullStory scores 4.5/5. Smartsheet is better for project_tracking and resource_management, while FullStory excels at session_replay and user_behavior_analysis.
Smartsheet starts at $9/user/mo per user/month with a free tier. FullStory starts at N/A per user/month with a free tier.
Smartsheet supports 150 integrations, while FullStory supports 70.
Data verified 2026-03-30. Some links may be affiliate links — see disclosure.