ToolStack

Smartsheet vs Figma

Side-by-side comparison · Updated 2026-03-30

Our VerdictSmartsheet wins overall

By G2 score and review volume, Smartsheet has the edge. 21,000 reviews at 4.4/5 puts it ahead of Figma (4.7/5). That said, the right pick depends on your methodology and team size.

Choose Smartsheet if…

Choose Smartsheet if your team focuses on project tracking and resource management and fits a scaleup, enterprise profile. Starting at $9/user/mo/user/mo with a free tier. Spreadsheet-familiar interface makes adoption easy for teams transitioning from Excel — minimal training needed for basic use

Choose Figma if…

Choose Figma if your team focuses on ui design and prototyping and fits a freelancer, startup profile. Starting at $15/user/mo/user/mo with a free tier. Browser-based with no installation required — runs on any OS and enables instant sharing via URL, removing friction for cross-functional collaboration with PMs, engineers, and stakeholders

Smartsheet
by Smartsheet
4.4
out of 5 · 21k+ G2 reviews
Visit Smartsheet ↗
Figma
by Figma
4.7
out of 5 · 4k+ G2 reviews
Visit Figma ↗

Feature Comparison

FeatureSmartsheetFigma
Category
work_management
ui_design
G2 Score
4.4 / 5.0
4.7 / 5.0Better
G2 Reviews
21000
4200
Free Tier
Starting Price
$9/user/moBetter
$15/user/mo
Mobile App
AI Features
API Access
SSO / SAML
SOC 2
Learning Curve
moderate
moderate
Platforms
web, mac, windows, ios, android
web, mac, windows, ios, android

Pros & Cons

Smartsheet

Pros
✓ Spreadsheet-familiar interface makes adoption easy for teams transitioning from Excel — minimal training needed for basic use
✓ Extremely powerful Gantt chart and dependency tracking capabilities, ideal for traditional project management and waterfall methodologies
✓ Robust automation engine with conditional logic, approval workflows, and automated notifications that scale across the organization
✓ Strong portfolio-level dashboards and reporting allow PMOs to aggregate data across dozens or hundreds of projects
Cons
✗ Not designed for agile/Scrum teams — lacks native sprint planning, backlog management, and velocity tracking
✗ Pricing can escalate quickly at scale since every collaborator who edits needs a licensed seat
✗ Sheet-based architecture creates data silos — cross-sheet references and formulas become complex and brittle at scale

Figma

Pros
✓ Browser-based with no installation required — runs on any OS and enables instant sharing via URL, removing friction for cross-functional collaboration with PMs, engineers, and stakeholders
✓ Best-in-class real-time multiplayer collaboration that allows entire design teams to work simultaneously in the same file with live cursors and commenting
✓ Powerful design system support with shared component libraries, variables, and design tokens that enforce consistency across products and teams at scale
✓ Massive plugin and community ecosystem with 2,000+ plugins, templates, and UI kits that accelerate workflows and extend functionality
Cons
✗ Performance degrades significantly with very large files containing hundreds of frames or complex component hierarchies — heavy files can lag even on powerful machines
✗ Requires internet connectivity for all editing — no true offline mode exists, which is problematic for users in low-connectivity environments
✗ Prototyping capabilities, while improved, still lack the advanced micro-interaction and animation fidelity of dedicated tools like Principle or ProtoPie

Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on your needs. Smartsheet scores 4.4/5 on G2, while Figma scores 4.7/5. Smartsheet is better for project_tracking and resource_management, while Figma excels at ui_design and prototyping.
Smartsheet starts at $9/user/mo per user/month with a free tier. Figma starts at $15/user/mo per user/month with a free tier.
Smartsheet supports 150 integrations, while Figma supports 2,000.
Full Smartsheet Review →Full Figma Review →
Data verified 2026-03-30. Some links may be affiliate links — see disclosure.