ToolStack

Miro vs FullStory

Side-by-side comparison · Updated 2026-03-30

Our VerdictMiro wins overall

On G2 data, Miro comes out ahead (4.7 vs FullStory's 4.5). But FullStory wins on price — so read the breakdown before deciding.

Choose Miro if…

Choose Miro if your team focuses on brainstorming and user story mapping and fits a startup, scaleup profile. Starting at $8/user/mo/user/mo with a free tier. Best-in-class infinite canvas experience — the gold standard for collaborative whiteboarding with real-time multiplayer editing

Choose FullStory if…

Choose FullStory if your team focuses on session replay and user behavior analysis and fits a startup, scaleup profile. Free tier available. Best-in-class autocapture technology — captures every click, scroll, and interaction without manual event tagging, enabling retroactive analysis on historical data

Miro
by Miro
4.7
out of 5 · 7k+ G2 reviews
Visit Miro ↗
FullStory
by FullStory
4.5
out of 5 · 900 G2 reviews
Visit FullStory ↗

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiroFullStory
Category
whiteboarding
session_replay
G2 Score
4.7 / 5.0Better
4.5 / 5.0
G2 Reviews
6700
900
Free Tier
Starting Price
$8/user/mo
—
Mobile App
AI Features
API Access
SSO / SAML
SOC 2
Learning Curve
easy
moderate
Platforms
web, mac, windows, ios, android
web

Pros & Cons

Miro

Pros
✓ Best-in-class infinite canvas experience — the gold standard for collaborative whiteboarding with real-time multiplayer editing
✓ Massive template library with 2,500+ community and built-in templates for user story mapping, retrospectives, journey maps, and more
✓ Extremely intuitive interface — new users can be productive in minutes, making it ideal for cross-functional workshops
✓ Excellent facilitation features including voting, timer, attention management, and presentation mode for remote workshops
Cons
✗ Performance can degrade significantly on very large boards with thousands of sticky notes, images, and embedded objects
✗ Free plan limited to only 3 editable boards — previous versions were more generous, which frustrates longtime users
✗ Pricing adds up quickly for large teams since all members need paid seats for full collaboration

FullStory

Pros
✓ Best-in-class autocapture technology — captures every click, scroll, and interaction without manual event tagging, enabling retroactive analysis on historical data
✓ Frustration signals (rage clicks, dead clicks, error clicks) surface UX problems automatically, saving PMs hours of manual session review
✓ Powerful search and segmentation — find specific user sessions by any combination of events, user properties, or frustration signals in seconds
✓ Strong privacy-by-design approach with automatic PII masking, excluded elements, and HIPAA-compliant configurations for regulated industries
Cons
✗ No transparent public pricing — Business and Enterprise plans require contacting sales, making budgeting difficult for smaller teams
✗ Session-based pricing can become very expensive at scale, especially for high-traffic consumer products with millions of monthly sessions
✗ Data retention on lower tiers is limited — teams may lose access to historical sessions unless on Enterprise plans

Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on your needs. Miro scores 4.7/5 on G2, while FullStory scores 4.5/5. Miro is better for brainstorming and user_story_mapping, while FullStory excels at session_replay and user_behavior_analysis.
Miro starts at $8/user/mo per user/month with a free tier. FullStory starts at N/A per user/month with a free tier.
Miro supports 200 integrations, while FullStory supports 70.
Full Miro Review →Full FullStory Review →
Data verified 2026-03-30. Some links may be affiliate links — see disclosure.