ToolStack

Asana vs Figma

Side-by-side comparison · Updated 2026-03-30

Our VerdictAsana wins overall

On G2 data, Asana comes out ahead (4.4 vs Figma's 4.7). But Figma wins on specific use cases — so read the breakdown before deciding.

Choose Asana if…

Choose Asana if your team focuses on cross functional project management and task management and fits a startup, scaleup profile. Free tier available. Exceptionally intuitive and visually clean interface — one of the lowest onboarding friction tools for non-technical teams

Choose Figma if…

Choose Figma if your team focuses on ui design and prototyping and fits a freelancer, startup profile. Starting at $15/user/mo/user/mo with a free tier. Browser-based with no installation required — runs on any OS and enables instant sharing via URL, removing friction for cross-functional collaboration with PMs, engineers, and stakeholders

Asana
by Asana
4.4
out of 5 · 13k+ G2 reviews
Visit Asana ↗
Figma
by Figma
4.7
out of 5 · 4k+ G2 reviews
Visit Figma ↗

Feature Comparison

FeatureAsanaFigma
Category
work_management
ui_design
G2 Score
4.4 / 5.0
4.7 / 5.0Better
G2 Reviews
13000
4200
Free Tier
Starting Price
—
$15/user/mo
Mobile App
AI Features
API Access
SSO / SAML
SOC 2
Learning Curve
moderate
moderate
Platforms
web, mac, windows, ios, android
web, mac, windows, ios, android

Pros & Cons

Asana

Pros
✓ Exceptionally intuitive and visually clean interface — one of the lowest onboarding friction tools for non-technical teams
✓ Multiple project views (list, board, timeline, calendar, Gantt) included from lower tiers, giving teams flexibility without add-ons
✓ Goals feature provides native OKR tracking with clear alignment from company objectives down to individual tasks
✓ Powerful Rules-based automation engine that allows no-code workflow automation across projects and teams
Cons
✗ No native idea management or customer feedback portal — product teams need separate tools like Productboard or Canny
✗ Limited sprint/agile functionality compared to Jira — Scrum teams may find sprint planning features shallow
✗ Reporting and dashboards, while improved, still lack the depth and customization of tools like Monday.com or Jira for advanced analytics

Figma

Pros
✓ Browser-based with no installation required — runs on any OS and enables instant sharing via URL, removing friction for cross-functional collaboration with PMs, engineers, and stakeholders
✓ Best-in-class real-time multiplayer collaboration that allows entire design teams to work simultaneously in the same file with live cursors and commenting
✓ Powerful design system support with shared component libraries, variables, and design tokens that enforce consistency across products and teams at scale
✓ Massive plugin and community ecosystem with 2,000+ plugins, templates, and UI kits that accelerate workflows and extend functionality
Cons
✗ Performance degrades significantly with very large files containing hundreds of frames or complex component hierarchies — heavy files can lag even on powerful machines
✗ Requires internet connectivity for all editing — no true offline mode exists, which is problematic for users in low-connectivity environments
✗ Prototyping capabilities, while improved, still lack the advanced micro-interaction and animation fidelity of dedicated tools like Principle or ProtoPie

Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on your needs. Asana scores 4.4/5 on G2, while Figma scores 4.7/5. Asana is better for cross_functional_project_management and task_management, while Figma excels at ui_design and prototyping.
Asana starts at N/A per user/month with a free tier. Figma starts at $15/user/mo per user/month with a free tier.
Asana supports 300 integrations, while Figma supports 2,000.
Full Asana Review →Full Figma Review →
Data verified 2026-03-30. Some links may be affiliate links — see disclosure.