ToolStack

Jira vs Figma

Side-by-side comparison · Updated 2026-03-08

Our VerdictFigma wins overall

Figma leads on our composite score — 4.7/5 on G2 vs Jira's 4.3/5 — but the gap is meaningful at the category level.

Choose Jira if…

Choose Jira if your team focuses on issue tracking and sprint planning and fits a startup, scaleup profile. Starting at $7.91/user/mo/user/mo with a free tier. Industry standard for software development teams — most PMs will encounter Jira in their career

Choose Figma if…

Choose Figma if your team focuses on ui design and prototyping and fits a freelancer, startup profile. Starting at $15/user/mo/user/mo with a free tier. Browser-based with no installation required — runs on any OS and enables instant sharing via URL, removing friction for cross-functional collaboration with PMs, engineers, and stakeholders

Jira
by Atlassian
4.3
out of 5 · 8k+ G2 reviews
Visit Jira ↗
Figma
by Figma
4.7
out of 5 · 4k+ G2 reviews
Visit Figma ↗

Feature Comparison

FeatureJiraFigma
Category
project_management
ui_design
G2 Score
4.3 / 5.0
4.7 / 5.0Better
G2 Reviews
7500
4200
Free Tier
Starting Price
$7.91/user/moBetter
$15/user/mo
Mobile App
AI Features
API Access
SSO / SAML
SOC 2
Learning Curve
steep
moderate
Platforms
web, mac, windows, ios, android
web, mac, windows, ios, android

Pros & Cons

Jira

Pros
✓ Industry standard for software development teams — most PMs will encounter Jira in their career
✓ Deepest configurability of any project management tool with custom fields, workflows, and screens
✓ 3,000+ marketplace integrations covering virtually every tool in the product stack
✓ Advanced Roadmaps for cross-team planning and dependency mapping (Premium tier)
Cons
✗ Steep learning curve — new users typically need 2-4 weeks to become productive
✗ Interface feels dated and cluttered compared to Linear and ClickUp
✗ Performance degrades noticeably on large instances with 10,000+ issues

Figma

Pros
✓ Browser-based with no installation required — runs on any OS and enables instant sharing via URL, removing friction for cross-functional collaboration with PMs, engineers, and stakeholders
✓ Best-in-class real-time multiplayer collaboration that allows entire design teams to work simultaneously in the same file with live cursors and commenting
✓ Powerful design system support with shared component libraries, variables, and design tokens that enforce consistency across products and teams at scale
✓ Massive plugin and community ecosystem with 2,000+ plugins, templates, and UI kits that accelerate workflows and extend functionality
Cons
✗ Performance degrades significantly with very large files containing hundreds of frames or complex component hierarchies — heavy files can lag even on powerful machines
✗ Requires internet connectivity for all editing — no true offline mode exists, which is problematic for users in low-connectivity environments
✗ Prototyping capabilities, while improved, still lack the advanced micro-interaction and animation fidelity of dedicated tools like Principle or ProtoPie

Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on your needs. Jira scores 4.3/5 on G2, while Figma scores 4.7/5. Jira is better for issue_tracking and sprint_planning, while Figma excels at ui_design and prototyping.
Jira starts at $7.91/user/mo per user/month with a free tier. Figma starts at $15/user/mo per user/month with a free tier.
Jira supports 3,000 integrations, while Figma supports 2,000.
Data verified 2026-03-08. Some links may be affiliate links — see disclosure.