Miro vs Mural vs FigJam — Side-by-Side Comparison 2026
Side-by-side comparison · Updated 2026-03-30
Miro, Mural, and FigJam all compete in the whiteboarding space — making the choice between them a common headache for growing product teams. All three are mature, well-reviewed platforms with strong G2 track records, but they differ meaningfully on team size fit and methodology alignment. This page breaks down the key differences so you can pick the right tool without reading three separate pricing pages.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Miro | Mural | FigJam |
|---|---|---|---|
| G2 Score | 4.7 / 5.0 | 4.6 / 5.0 | 4.5 / 5.0 |
| G2 Reviews | 6700 | 600 | 800 |
| Free Tier | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Starting Price | $8/user/mo | $12/user/mo | $5/user/mo |
| Mobile App | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| AI Features | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| API Access | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| SSO / SAML | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| SOC 2 | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Automations | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Learning Curve | easy | moderate | easy |
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Miro if your team is focused on brainstorming and user story mapping and skews toward a startup or scaleup profile. Budget-wise, it starts at $8/user/mo/user/mo. Best-in-class infinite canvas experience — the gold standard for collaborative whiteboarding with real-time multiplayer editing
Choose Mural if your team is focused on remote workshops and brainstorming and skews toward a startup or scaleup profile. Budget-wise, it starts at $12/user/mo/user/mo. Purpose-built for facilitation — timer, voting, private mode, and guided workflows make it the strongest tool for running remote and hybrid workshops
Choose FigJam if your team is focused on brainstorming and retrospectives and skews toward a startup or scaleup profile. Budget-wise, it starts at $5/user/mo/user/mo. Seamless integration with Figma design files — easily embed and reference design work directly in whiteboard sessions